All Prop Firms and Challenges That Allow EAs/Bots/Algos
Finding prop firms that truly allow EAs, bots or algorithmic trading can feel confusing. Many firms hide their restrictions in long rule sheets, and it is hard to know who actually supports automation and who quietly blocks it.
I’ve traded with these firms myself, using everything from simple EAs to advanced custom coded systems, and I built this comparison to help you skip the hours of digging through policies, Discord messages and support chats.
The table below breaks down the details that actually matter when trading with automation, such as profit split, drawdown limits, challenge structure, platform compatibility, and the exact EA restrictions each firm applies. Whether you run MT4 or MT5 EAs, cTrader, or your own algorithm, you can quickly filter out the firms that will not fit your strategy.
Below you’ll find the full comparison.
💡 Note: Some links below are affiliate links. I’ve personally traded with these firms and only list companies I’ve verified myself. By using them, you may receive special discounts, and you’ll also support my work.
Whether you don’t have time to trade or you just want to be free and let your EA do the job for you, prop firms that allow EAs trading are a good solution for you.
Of course that you can do it with your own account, but trading capital from a proprietary trading firm may be much less risky and stressful.
In this article, you’ll learn what the top best trading prop firms are where you can use EAs, algos, or bots, and you’ll be able to compare them to choose the best one for your personal situation.
These prop firms are not at the top 3, but are also interesting, and generally not really far away from the previous ones in terms of quality and services provided.
If you are undecided between two or more prop trading firms to put your EAs trading, you can use our prop firm comparison tool. Just choose the firms that you want to compare and immediately check the results with a detailed comparison.
Compare Any Prop Firm
What Are EA-Friendly Prop Firms Really Looking For?
Most traders think an EA-friendly prop firm is simply one that says “automation allowed,” but in practice, it’s a lot more specific. After testing automated systems across several firms, I learned that what really matters is how your EA behaves, not just whether bots are permitted.
When a prop firm evaluates automation, they focus on risk, execution, and intent. Your code needs to behave like a normal market participant, not like a system trying to exploit platform gaps or feed delays.
Prop firms typically check for three things:
Stability – your EA must trade in a way that matches normal market conditions.
Risk control – no runaway position sizing, no martingale, no grid exposure.
Integrity – no behaviour that looks like latency arbitrage, copy-trading bots, or mass-distributed black-box systems.
From my own experience, the quickest way to get flagged is to use a rented EA where hundreds of traders run identical parameters. Prop firms notice this instantly because the trades hit the server at the same second, with the same sizing, on the same symbols.
Another thing they examine is trade frequency. If your bot fires 50 orders per minute, most firms will classify it as HFT, even if you didn’t mean to build a high-frequency system.
Some also monitor execution patterns, like opening and closing positions too quickly or operating only during ticks with thin liquidity. These behaviors trigger automated risk alerts because they resemble unfair execution tactics.
If you build your own system, keep the logic transparent and easy to explain. When a prop firm understands what your EA is trying to do, you’re far more likely to stay compliant.
How Prop Firms Treat EAs: From Fully Open to Highly Restricted
Prop firms don’t treat automated trading the same way.
After trading with EAs for years, I’ve seen every type of policy: from firms that welcome automation with open arms to others that ban bots entirely.
Understanding these categories helps you avoid wasting time on firms that don’t match your EA’s behaviour.
Some firms allow automation with almost no barriers.
Others only allow it if you prove the strategy is safe.
And a few block automation outright because they don’t want the operational risk.
Below are the three main categories you’ll encounter.
1. Prop Firms That Allow EAs With Minimal Restrictions
These firms allow most types of automation as long as the trading remains “normal” and respects the rules.
They’re usually a good match for traders running unique, privately coded, or well-controlled systems.
Typical characteristics include:
No restrictions on trading style, but no abusive behaviour.
Clear rules, often stating what’s not allowed instead of what is.
Compatibility with multiple platforms, like MT4, MT5, cTrader, or API-based setups.
Acceptance of long-term, slow, or event-driven algos, not just scalpers.
When I ran my own EAs on firms in this category, the key was risk discipline.
If your system respects daily loss and max drawdown rules, you usually stay out of trouble.
2. Prop Firms That Allow EAs Under Specific Conditions
This is the most common setup in the industry.
These firms technically allow bots, but only if you follow a stricter set of risk and behaviour guidelines.
They usually monitor:
Trade frequency (avoid anything resembling HFT).
Order timing (no exploiting slow ticks or delayed feeds).
Uniqueness of strategy, meaning no rented or mass-distributed bots.
Risk concentration, especially on correlated pairs or multiple accounts.
Execution patterns, making sure the bot behaves like a real trader would.
In my experience, these firms are very fair, but only if you understand their rules.
If your EA fires trades too fast or repeats the same parameters that another 300 traders are using, you’ll get flagged quickly.
This category is ideal for custom-coded systems, not “downloaded from Telegram” EAs.
3. Prop Firms That Block Bots Entirely
Some prop firms avoid automation altogether.
This is usually because they can’t handle the risk, liquidity stress, or execution load that automation creates.
Most firms that block automation say it’s due to:
Correlated risk when too many people run similar EAs.
Server load spikes from rapid order bursts.
Market feed abuse, especially from latency-based systems.
Inability to verify who actually coded the bot.
Fear of reputational damage if automation triggers massive one-sided exposure.
If your trading is fully automated, these firms should be avoided.
Running an EA here usually results in an account suspension or canceled payout.
A good shortcut: If the firm is vague or unclear about automation, assume they don’t want EAs.
What to Look For in Prop Firms That Allow EAs, Bots or Algos
When you trade with automation, the prop firm you choose can make or break your results.
After testing EAs across several firms, I learned that the key is not just whether bots are allowed. The real question is whether the rules, platforms, and execution conditions support automated trading in a safe and consistent way.
Below is a practical checklist you can use before joining any EA-friendly prop firm.
Trading Rules That Matter for EA Users
The first thing to check is how the firm structures its risk model.
Your EA must operate comfortably inside those limits.
Look for:
Daily drawdown rules that fit your system.
Maximum total drawdown that does not punish occasional volatility.
Minimum trading days that do not force your EA to open unnecessary trades.
Time limits that allow your strategy to perform naturally.
Leverage that matches your EA’s required position sizing.
If your bot uses tight stops or scales positions, even a small difference in the drawdown formula can create unexpected losses.
This is where most automated traders fail the evaluation without understanding why.
Platform Compatibility and Technical Stability
Your automation is only as good as the platform it runs on.
Different prop firms offer different environments, and each one behaves slightly differently with EAs.
The main platforms you will find are:
MetaTrader 4, simple, widely supported, but technically outdated.
MetaTrader 5, faster, better for advanced EAs, improved execution handling.
cTrader, ideal for cBots and modern programming workflows.
TradeLocker or API based systems, suitable for custom-coded models or Python strategies.
In my experience, platform stability is often more important than spread or commissions.
A single platform freeze can break the logic of an EA that depends on timing, trailing stops or rapid entries.
Risk Management Alignment
A good EA is built with its own internal risk rules.
However, a prop firm has its own rules too, and the two need to match.
Focus on:
Consistent spreads during active hours.
Reasonable slippage, especially for algos that trade news or volatility spikes.
Clear lot size limits on specific instruments.
Execution speed, so your system behaves the same as during testing.
If your EA depends on low spreads or fast execution, a slow feed or wide spread environment will immediately break performance.
This is why I always test each EA on a small account before running a larger evaluation.
Strategy Restrictions You Must Respect
Even EA-friendly prop firms impose restrictions to maintain fair trading conditions.
These restrictions protect their liquidity partners and prevent abuse.
Common restricted strategies include:
High frequency trading.
Tick scalping, especially systems that open and close trades within seconds.
Latency arbitrage, where the EA tries to exploit price delays.
Hedge arbitrage or reverse arbitrage, especially between two accounts.
Grid and martingale, which increase risk rapidly.
Copy trading bots, where many traders run identical logic.
If your system uses any of these techniques, you must adapt the strategy or choose a firm with more flexible conditions.
Filter 100's of Prop Firm challenges
Set your options and PropScan your challenge
Free challenge search tool
My Experience Trading With EAs on Prop Firms
Running EAs on prop firms taught me that automated trading is not just about coding a system and letting it run.
You need to understand how your bot behaves under the specific rules that each prop firm uses.
Different firms have different risk models, so the same EA can pass one evaluation and fail another with the exact same settings.
When I first automated my trading, I discovered that the biggest challenge was not profitability but staying compliant.
Your EA can make ten winning trades in a row, but if one spike violates the daily drawdown rule, your evaluation ends instantly.
I learned to adapt my bots to each firm’s environment.
For example, I had an EA that performed perfectly in backtests and on my personal account.
However, during a prop challenge, it opened positions too early because spreads were slightly wider on that firm, and that single detail ruined the setup logic.
Another EA I used relied on trading during market opens.
It worked well on brokers with stable spreads, but on some prop feeds, the spread widened just before execution, which triggered my stop loss immediately.
This experience taught me to always forward test under similar conditions before risking a challenge fee.
One important lesson was about trade frequency.
I once ran an EA that opened several positions within a minute during a fast move.
Even though it was not a high-frequency system, the behaviour looked too aggressive for the firm’s risk filters, and the account was flagged.
After that, I coded a safety check that limited the number of trades per hour.
I also learned that minimum trading days can affect automated systems.
Some of my EAs are low frequency, and they might only find one or two trades per week.
If an evaluation required more active days, I needed to create a safer, lightweight version of the strategy just to satisfy that requirement without forcing unnecessary trades.
One more thing that matters is uniqueness.
If you use publicly available EAs, your trades can look identical to hundreds of other traders.
Prop firms detect these patterns very easily.
This is why I eventually built most of my systems from scratch or heavily modified existing ones so that the behaviour is unique and personalized.
The more I experimented, the clearer it became that EA trading on prop firms is not simply about automation.
It is about understanding how the rules, spreads, timing, and platform conditions shape your bot’s behaviour.
Once you align your EA with those conditions, everything becomes smoother and more predictable.
Advantages Of Running EAs on Prop Firms
Trading with EAs on prop firms gives you a set of benefits that are difficult to match with manual trading.
When you automate your strategy, you remove the emotional swings that normally sabotage decision-making.
This is especially useful during challenges, since the pressure to pass can make manual traders second-guess their setups.
One of the biggest advantages is consistency.
An EA follows rules without hesitation, and it executes the plan exactly as you coded it.
When I rely on manual execution, I sometimes hesitate or skip a setup, but an EA never misses an entry that fits the logic.
Automated systems also give you constant market coverage.
Your EA can scan dozens of pairs, indices, or commodities at the same time.
This means you can catch opportunities you would never see manually.
Another advantage is speed.
Bots react instantly when conditions match the rules.
This is valuable for breakout strategies, quick pullbacks, or setups that require precise timing.
EAs are also useful for scaling.
When your system is stable, you can run it on multiple instruments or multiple accounts, as long as you stay within prop firm rules.
This allows you to increase your output without increasing your workload.
Automation helps with data-driven decisions.
EAs can be backtested, forward tested and optimized across different market conditions.
This gives you confidence that your strategy is not random or emotional.
A small but important advantage is avoiding overtrading.
Many traders enter too many trades when they feel frustrated.
An EA prevents this completely because it will only execute when the rules are valid.
Finally, automated systems help you handle longer trading windows.
You do not need to sit at your computer during the New York open or late Asian sessions.
Your EA works while you sleep, and you only check performance and logs later.
These advantages make automation a strong choice for traders who want steady execution and well-controlled risk.
Disadvantages Of Running EAs on Prop Firms
Using EAs on prop firms can be powerful, but it also introduces risks that many traders underestimate.
The first risk is technical failure.
If your VPS freezes, if the platform restarts, or if your EA gets stuck on a logic loop, your entire evaluation can collapse in seconds.
Another issue is feed inconsistency.
Prop firms use different liquidity providers, and spreads behave differently from retail brokers.
If your EA depends on tight spreads or fast execution, even a small delay can destroy the performance you saw during backtesting.
You also need to consider strategy restrictions.
Many firms block high-frequency trading, latency-based entries, or grid and martingale systems.
If your EA depends on any of these behaviours, you will either get flagged or break the rules accidentally.
A common risk is over-optimization.
Many traders create EAs that look perfect in backtests because they curve-fit parameters to past data.
In real markets, these systems collapse as soon as volatility changes.
Another disadvantage is the lack of adaptability.
A human trader can avoid trading during news events or unpredictable market hours.
An EA will execute unless you specifically program it to stay idle.
Correlated behaviour is another hidden danger.
If many traders use the same EA or similar parameters, firms can detect the pattern and treat it as a risk cluster.
This can lead to rejected payouts or cancelled accounts.
Some EAs also generate trade clusters, which means too many positions within a short timeframe.
Even if the strategy is not intended to be HFT, the behaviour can look like HFT from the firm’s perspective.
Another real challenge is risk rules misalignment.
A prop firm may use equity-based daily drawdown or balance-based max drawdown.
If your EA does not account for this, a single spike can violate limits even if the overall strategy is profitable.
You must also watch out for unrealistic position sizing.
Some bots increase lot sizes aggressively when volatility is low.
This behaviour can pass on a retail account but fail instantly on a funded evaluation with strict risk limits.
Finally, automation can create a false sense of safety.
Some traders trust the EA too much and forget to check logs, executions, or behaviour during unusual market conditions.
I learned early that even the best EA needs supervision, especially during news events or platform updates.
How to Prepare Your EA for a Prop Firm Challenge
Preparing an EA for a prop firm challenge is not the same as preparing it for a personal account.
Prop environments have unique rules, different liquidity, and strict risk thresholds.
Your EA must be adapted to handle all of this before you even think about starting an evaluation.
The best approach is to treat preparation like a complete workflow.
You test the strategy, then you test the execution, and only then you test how it behaves inside actual challenge conditions.
Below are the steps I follow every time I prepare an EA for prop trading.
Step 1. Backtest Across Multiple Market Regimes
A single backtest is not enough.
You need to run your EA through trending, ranging, and high volatility periods.
This shows you how the system behaves during both easy and stressful conditions.
Focus on:
Several years of historical data.
Different spread conditions.
Variable volatility periods.
Major events such as rate decisions.
Both calm and chaotic price cycles.
When I started automating my trading, I learned that an EA that only works in calm markets will fail instantly during a challenge.
Prop firms expect stability across different market phases, so your EA must survive more than one type of environment.
Step 2. Forward Test Under Realistic Execution Conditions
Backtesting shows the theory.
Forward testing shows reality.
You should always run your EA on a live or demo feed that behaves similarly to prop firm conditions.
Focus on:
Spreads during volatile hours.
Slippage during news.
Execution speed of market and limit orders.
Real-time behaviour of trailing stops and partial closes.
Trade frequency under true market data.
In my experience, most failures come from execution differences, not from the strategy itself.
A bot that works perfectly on your personal broker can behave completely differently on a prop firm feed.
Step 3. Hard Code Risk Parameters for Prop Rules
Prop firms have strict limits. If your EA does not follow them automatically, the account can fail in one bad candle.
Make sure your bot respects:
Daily loss limit, based on equity.
Overall drawdown, with both balance and equity variations.
Maximum lot sizes, per instrument.
Allowed trading sessions, if the firm restricts hours.
Trade frequency, so it does not look like HFT.
I always add a safety layer in my EA.
If equity drops below a certain threshold, the bot blocks entries until the next trading day.
This kept me safe many times, especially during unexpected volatility.
Step 4. Stress Test Execution and Safety Logic
A working EA is not enough.
You need a resilient EA.
Test your system under:
Platform restarts.
VPS disconnections.
Slow execution due to market activity.
Spread spikes during rollovers.
Failed order attempts.
Missing tick data.
I once had an EA that opened a position but failed to place a stop loss because the platform froze for half a second.
After that incident, I coded a redundancy check that verifies the stop loss is placed.
This type of safety logic is essential for prop trading.
Step 5. Match the EA to the Prop Firm’s Rule Structure
Every firm has its own rules, and your EA must respect them by design.
Before starting a challenge, verify:
If the firm uses a balance-based or equity-based drawdown.
The minimum and maximum number of trading days.
The allowed leverage per symbol.
The contract size of each instrument.
Restrictions on news trading.
If the firm prohibits grid, martingale, arbitrage, or copy trading behaviour.
A system that works perfectly in retail conditions can breach prop rules in seconds.
This is why matching the EA to the firm’s structure is a critical step.
Step 6. Run a Full Simulation of Challenge Conditions
Before spending money on an evaluation, simulate the full challenge.
Use the same:
Account size.
Drawdown rules.
Trading hours.
Instruments.
Risk per trade.
I usually run the simulation for at least thirty days.
This shows me whether the EA can handle both normal periods and unexpected volatility without blowing the account.
When your EA can pass this simulation consistently, you know it is ready.
Your EA is only as strong as the preparation behind it.
Prop firms reward consistency and risk control, and the steps above help you design a bot that meets those expectations.
Filter 100's of Prop Firm challenges
Set your options and PropScan your challenge
Free challenge search tool
Tips to Choose the Right Prop Firm if You Trade With EAs
Choosing the right prop firm for EA trading means choosing a firm whose rules, platform stability, and execution environment match the behaviour of your specific system.
After testing different EAs across multiple firms, these are the tips that consistently made a difference.
Look for Clear and Transparent Rules
The best EA-friendly firms explain exactly what they allow and what they do not allow.
If the firm is vague, or if their rulebook feels unclear, automation usually becomes risky.
You should look for:
A clear list of restricted strategies.
Transparent explanations of daily and overall drawdown.
Simple rules for trade frequency and execution behaviour.
Straightforward definitions of what counts as abuse.
When a firm explains its conditions clearly, you avoid surprises during payouts or evaluations.
Make Sure the Platform Matches Your EA’s Requirements
Your EA may depend on fast execution or clean tick data. Some platforms handle this better than others.
Consider these details:
MetaTrader 5 handles complex EAs more smoothly than MT4.
cTrader works well if you use cBots or want cleaner execution logs.
API based setups are ideal for custom Python or algorithmic systems.
From my experience, the platform is often the most important factor.
Even a strong EA can fail if the platform lags or if the execution feed behaves differently from your testing environment.
Check Risk Rules Before You Buy a Challenge
The way a prop firm calculates drawdown will determine how your EA behaves during stressful periods.
Some firms use equity-based rules. Others use balance-based rules.
If your EA does not adjust to that model, it can violate limits without warning.
Pay attention to:
Daily loss structure.
Total drawdown calculation.
Minimum trading days.
Maximum exposure allowed at once.
Limits on trading during news.
When I run an EA on a new firm, I always hard-code the risk model directly into the strategy.
This prevents accidental violations and keeps the account safe.
Avoid Firms With Unstable Execution or Unreliable Feeds
EA performance depends heavily on execution quality.
If spreads widen randomly or if orders slip too much, the strategy becomes unpredictable.
You should test:
Market orders during active sessions.
Stop loss placement accuracy.
Slippage during news.
Execution speed during volatility.
I always forward test for at least a few days before starting an evaluation.
This small test helps you understand if the environment fits your EA or not.
Choose Firms That Support Your Trading Style
Different EAs behave differently.
Some are long-term and low-frequency. Others are scalpers. Some depend on liquidity windows.
Make sure the firm supports:
The symbols your EA trades.
The trading sessions your EA needs.
The lot sizes required for your strategy.
The time needed for your system to perform.
For example, if your EA is slow and only trades a few times per week, you need a firm with no time limits or flexible minimum trading days.
Test With a Small Evaluation First
Even the strongest EA behaves differently across environments.
Running a smaller challenge first helps you prevent unnecessary losses.
I often test new bots on a small evaluation instead of jumping straight to a large account.
A few days of observation can save you both time and money.
Choosing the right prop firm is a strategic decision. Your EA must run in an environment where the rules, platform, and execution conditions support its behaviour. When you match these elements correctly, automated prop trading becomes far more predictable.
Common Mistakes EA Traders Make on Prop Firms
EA traders often lose challenges not because their strategy is bad, but because they overlook details that are specific to prop firm environments.
I made several of these mistakes myself when I started automating my evaluations.
Once you understand them, avoiding them becomes easy.
Running Public or Rented EAs Without Modifying Them
One of the most common mistakes is using an EA that hundreds of other traders already run. Prop firms detect identical behaviour very quickly.
If your entries, exits, and timing match a large group of accounts, the firm will treat it as copy trading or correlated risk.
Always customize the logic or parameters so your EA behaves in a unique way.
This keeps you compliant and makes the strategy more stable.
Ignoring the Firm’s Drawdown Model
Many traders fail because their EA does not respect the firm’s daily or overall drawdown rules.
Some firms calculate drawdown from equity, others use balance.
If your EA assumes one model and the firm uses another, violations happen instantly.
I learned this the hard way.
A small open loss triggered a daily limit because I coded the bot for balance based rules instead of equity based rules.
Always match the risk logic to the firm before starting.
Trading During News Without Controls
High-impact news can create slippage, spread spikes and fast directional moves.
Most EAs are not built to handle this.
If your system trades blindly through news events, you can break rules or hit drawdown limits in seconds.
Add protections such as:
News filters.
Spread filters.
Volatility checks.
Your EA should know when to stand aside.
Letting the EA Trade Every Single Condition
Some traders allow their EA to run 24 hours per day with no supervision.
This is a mistake.
There are times when spreads widen, liquidity drops, or market conditions become unpredictable.
I always set my bots to pause during rollover, weekends and major announcements.
These small adjustments protect the account and keep trading behaviour consistent.
Not Controlling Trade Frequency
Prop firms monitor how often you open positions.
Even if your EA is not designed for high-frequency trading, a bug or a rapid signal can look like it.
If your EA opens too many orders in a short period, the system can be flagged.
Add a limiter so your EA cannot exceed a certain number of trades per hour.
Using Real Account Settings on Prop Environments Without Testing
Many traders build an EA for their personal broker and use the same settings on prop firms.
This rarely works.
Prop feeds have different spreads, volatility, and execution speed.
Forward test your EA under similar conditions before starting a challenge.
This small step prevents a lot of unnecessary failures.
Over Optimizing the EA
Curve fitting is one of the biggest pitfalls in automated trading.
An EA may look perfect on historical data because it is tailored to the past.
However, that same strategy collapses on live conditions because it was never robust.
Use broad parameter ranges and multiple years of data.
Your EA should survive both good and bad periods without relying on perfect conditions.
Not Accounting for Platform Behavior
Different trading platforms process orders differently.
For example, some handle trailing stops or partial closes slower than others.
This affects how your EA behaves when markets move quickly.
If you switch platforms, test the EA thoroughly before trusting it in a challenge.
Execution structure matters just as much as strategy logic.
Forgetting Minimum Trading Days
Low-frequency EAs can take days between trades.
If the firm requires a certain number of active trading days, the EA may not meet the requirement naturally.
Some traders force their bot to take low-quality trades just to fill the requirement.
Instead, create a safe, lightweight version of your EA that places controlled trades when needed.
Not Monitoring the EA Regularly
Even the best EA needs supervision.
There will always be unexpected execution events, platform updates or VPS issues.
If you never check the logs or trade history, you may miss warning signs.
I set a fixed routine of checking my EAs once or twice a day.
This helps detect issues early before they break the account.
Avoiding these mistakes can increase your success rate dramatically.
Once you understand how prop firm environments behave, your EA becomes a much stronger and safer tool.
Conclusion
Trading with EAs on prop firms can be incredibly effective when you understand how the environment works.
Automation gives you consistency, precision, and discipline, but it only works when the prop firm’s rules, execution quality, and risk structure match your system.
From my experience, the real secret is preparation.
A well-tested EA can pass challenges and perform in funded accounts, but only if it is adapted to the firm’s conditions.
When you combine proper backtesting, good forward testing, and strong safety logic, automated prop trading becomes far more predictable.
The comparison table at the top of this page gives you a clear overview of the firms and challenges that support EAs, bots, and algorithmic strategies.
Use it to choose the firm that aligns with your trading style and the way your automation behaves.
Your EA does not need to be perfect.
It just needs to be consistent, risk-aware and built for the environment you trade in.
Once you match the strategy with the right prop firm, everything becomes smoother.
Now compare the firms above and choose the one that fits your EA’s rules and your trading approach.
FAQ
Do prop firms allow EAs, bots or algos?
Some prop firms allow automation fully, while others accept it only with restrictions that block strategies like high frequency trading, arbitrage or grid systems. It is important to read each firm’s rules carefully, because automated behaviour that looks normal to you may still violate their risk filters.
Can an EA realistically pass a prop firm challenge?
Yes, an EA can pass a challenge if it respects drawdown limits, follows normal execution behaviour and avoids restricted strategies. I have passed evaluations with automation before, but only after adjusting the EA to match the firm’s specific rules and execution conditions.
Why do some prop firms restrict automated trading?
Prop firms limit automation to prevent abusive behaviours such as latency exploitation, correlated trading from mass-used bots, and excessive order frequency that stresses the trading infrastructure. Restrictions protect their risk models and keep trading conditions fair for all participants.
Do I need a VPS to run an EA on a prop firm?
A VPS is strongly recommended, because it keeps your EA running even if your computer disconnects or restarts. A stable VPS ensures consistent execution and reduces the risk of losing a challenge due to technical interruptions rather than trading performance.
Are bots safer than manual trading on prop firms?
Bots remove emotional mistakes and create consistent decision making, but they are only as safe as their coding and execution environment. If the EA is poorly prepared for spread changes, slippage or volatility, it can break rules faster than a human trader would.
What is the biggest risk when using EAs on prop firms?
The biggest risk is violating drawdown limits due to unexpected market behaviour or a missing safety rule in the strategy. Even profitable EAs can fail instantly if they do not adapt to the firm’s risk model, which is why preparation and forward testing are essential.
How can I make sure my EA is unique?
Customize your parameters, add your own logic and avoid using free or rented EAs without modification. Prop firms can detect identical trading patterns across many accounts, so a personal touch helps you stay compliant and reduces the chance of being flagged.
Should I avoid trading during news with an EA?
Most automated systems struggle during high impact news because spreads widen and execution becomes unstable. It is better to include news filters or volatility checks, so your EA pauses during unpredictable events instead of risking a sudden drawdown violation.
What platforms are best for automated prop trading?
MetaTrader 5, MetaTrader 4, cTrader and API based solutions are the most common choices, and the right one depends on the type of automation you use. MT5 usually handles complex EAs better, while cTrader offers cleaner execution and more advanced coding options.
How do I know if my EA is ready for a prop challenge?
Your EA is ready when it can pass a full simulation under the firm’s exact conditions, including drawdown rules, execution speed and trading hours. If it performs well under both normal and stressful conditions, the strategy is usually strong enough for a live evaluation.
Hey, I'm Pedro and I'm determined to make someone a successful trader. My only question is, will it be you?
About Pedro
I started LivingFromTrading as a way to give people a simple and effective way to learn about trading financial markets.
The 21st century is all about living globally, traveling, and being able to work remotely from anywhere in the world.
Trading is completely aligned with that. It's all about freedom. We are our bosses, working from anywhere, working the time that we want, being able to spend time with our family, and having time to do everything that we like. And the special bonus, we have no limits when it comes to how much we can earn.
I'm a full-time trader since 2012. In 2015 I won a forex competition, with a real money account.
With LivingFromTrading I'm passing to you all the knowledge that I wished to have received when I was struggling to crack the markets.
